The Quartile Atlas · FCA household data
FCA General Insurance Value Measures · Jul 2021 – Dec 2025

The best home insurers still pay out. The worst have fallen away.

Every UK household insurer reports the same four numbers to the regulator: how often customers claim, how often those claims are accepted, what the average payout is, and how many claims turn into complaints. Five years of that data, for buildings, contents and combined cover, is laid out here in twelve views. The single clearest finding is that the market average conceals a spread that is getting wider — not because the leaders improved, but because the laggards fell.

93 insurers 560 firm-product-period records 3 household products 5 reporting periods 12 interactive views
Plate 01 · The Headline

The widening gap

For buildings-and-contents cover, the gap between the average top-quartile insurer and the average bottom-quartile insurer on claims acceptance widened from 27.5 points to 38.6 points. The top held almost perfectly steady. The bottom collapsed.

Plate 02 · What It Means

Top quartile versus bottom quartile, head to head

The same product, the same year, the same regulator's definition of an accepted claim. Pick a product and a period and see exactly what separates the two ends of the table — and which insurers sit at each end.

Plate 03 · The Field

Every insurer, every year, as a distribution

A market average is one number standing in for dozens of very different firms. Here is the whole field: one dot per insurer per year, with the quartile cuts drawn in. Watch the lower tail stretch downwards.

Plate 04 · Movement

Quartile trajectories

Rank each insurer within its product each period and join the dots. Of the 77 insurers reporting at both ends of the window, 42 finished in the quartile they started in — position here is stickier than it ought to be.

Plate 05 · Persistence

Who is always good, and who is always bottom

Fifteen cells per insurer — three products across five periods — coloured by quartile. Read down the rows: a handful of names are almost solid blue, and a handful are almost solid red, for five straight years.

Plate 06 · First to Last

Who improved, and who went backwards

Each insurer's claims-acceptance rate at the start of the window against its rate at the end. Changes smaller than one FCA band are not meaningful and are greyed out.

Plate 07 · Transitions

Where the 2021 quartiles ended up

Firms that were top quartile in the second half of 2021, tracked to 2025 — plus the insurers that entered the table and the ones that left it altogether.

Plate 08 · Two Measures at Once

Acceptance against complaints

Accepting claims and avoiding complaints ought to go together. Plotted against each other, with the market average as the crosshair, they mostly do — but the exceptions are instructive. Press play to watch the field move.

Plate 09 · Product by Product

Buildings, contents, combined — the same insurer, three answers

Buildings claims are accepted far less often than contents claims across the whole market. But some insurers are far more inconsistent between their own products than others.

Plate 10 · The Directory

Every insurer, on one card

Ninety-three insurers, each with a five-year sparkline for all three products on a shared scale. Sort, search, or filter down to the top and bottom quartiles.

Plate 11 · The Market Underneath

Market vitals

The exact market-level aggregates behind the firm tables: premiums, policies, payouts, frequency and the share of premium that comes back to customers as claims.

Plate 12 · Small Print

Method, bands, restatements and caveats

How the quartiles were built, why firm-level figures are ranges rather than numbers, which figures the FCA restated between publications, and what this data cannot tell you.